Recent Comments

DAMU Blog Aggregators

DAMU Blogs (aka Outer Blogness)

Interfaith Discussion

April 15, 2008

Song of the Week: Trapped

I saw Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band at the American Airlines Center in Dallas the other night.  Fantastic show with many great performances.  One of the highlights for me was the song "Trapped."  I dedicate it here to the many doubters, skeptics, nonbelievers, and disaffected Mormons who feel trapped in the LDS church because of social or family pressure to maintain a facade of testimony.

Well it seems like I'm caught up in your trap again
And it seems like I'll be wearin' the same ol' chains
Good will conquer evil and the truth will set you free
Then I know someday I'll find the key
Then I know somewhere I'll find the key
Well it seem like I've been playin' the game way too long
And it seems the game I played has made you strong
Well when the game is over, I won't walk out a loser
And I know that I'll walk out of here again
And I know that someday I'll walk out of here again

But now I'm trapped...Oh yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah!

Now it seems like I've been sleepin' in your bed too long
And it seems like you've been meanin' to do me harm
But I'll teach my eyes to see beyond these walls in front of me
And someday I'll walk out of here again
Yeah I know someday I'll walk out of here again

(Chorus)

Well it seem like I've been playin' the game way too long
And it seems the game I played has made you strong

Because I'm trapped...Oh yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah!

I'm trapped...Oh yeah yeah!
Trapped...Oh yeah yeah
Trapped...Oh yeahhhhhh
Trapped....oh yeahhhh
I'm trapped.

April 13, 2008

Ecclesiastical Harassment in the Plano, Texas Stake? Say it Ain't So!

As readers of Equality Time know, I resigned my membership in February of this year.  The bishop in the ward in which I reside and the stake president here in Plano, Texas are friends of mine and handled my resignation with speed and courtesy, which I appreciate.  In meeting with the bishop and stake president after tendering my resignation, I told the stake president (who had only been set apart a week or two earlier) that while my resignation may be the first he processes, it certainly would not be the last.

Well, my words were prophetic.  Sure enough, a friend of mine (Lunar Quaker, who occasionally posts here and around the Disaffected Mormon Underground) residing in a different ward in the Plano Stake, last week sent his resignation letter to his bishop.  Unfortunately, his bishop handled things quite differently from the way mine did.  I can't believe that this represents a change in policy or direction from the good man who is stake president here.  I sincerely hope that it is not the policy of the Plano Stake to have bishops or other ecclesiastical leaders harass people who want to resign their membership and have their names removed from the church records.  I hope that the stake president, if he finds out about the way my friend was treated, will do the right thing and counsel with and chastise LQ's bishop for his belligerent, unChristlike actions.  LQ's story, in his own words, after the jump.

Continue reading "Ecclesiastical Harassment in the Plano, Texas Stake? Say it Ain't So!" »

April 09, 2008

In Keeping with Our Modesty Theme

The photo of the new General Young Women's Presidency of the LDS church was just crying out for a graphic representation of where the church's increasingly strict "standards" on modest dress is heading.

View this photo

April 05, 2008

A Sense of the Despicable

I originally posted this back on May 28, 2006. But in honor of the subject being "called" as a new "apostle" today in the LDS church, I thought I'd resurrect it and post it anew. I wonder if the opinions he expressed in the article will now take on additional heft among the members? Are words spoken prior to one's call given apostolic authori-tay?

If Jesus were to walk into an LDS church meeting today, how would He be received? If the latest article in a church magazine on the subject of dress and grooming is any indication, Jesus very likely would be asked to leave. Why? Well, let’s start with hair: in all the pictures I have seen of Jesus, He has long hair. And, typically, He is shown wearing open-toed shoes. According to an LDS church General Authority, such things are offensive to God.

Continue reading "A Sense of the Despicable" »

April 02, 2008

Song of the Week 2: Run

Was just spinning some Pat Green in my iPod and stumbled on this song that made me think of some of my peeps in the DAMU, so I dedicate it to them. It's called "Run."

Finally free
Finally gone
Finally breathing again
Finally back out on my own

Finally here
In an otherwise empty room
Where there's no one here to tear me all apart

Yeah tonight I'm gonna go out
I'm gonna get a little wasted.
Yeah I'm one of those guys
I'm one of those guys

I gotta run
Gotta be free
Don't hold me down
No baby

Yeah and speakin of faith
I finally found me a song
I'm in the same old place
But there's a lot less screamin and carryin on
Too much pain
Too much hate
Not enough fire
Now its way too late

Yeah tonight I'm gonna go out
I'm gonna get a little wasted.
I'm one of those guys
I'm one of those guys

You're looking back at me with your pretty little eyes
And you want so bad for me to try and change
You tried that one before
Win the battle lose the war
Just count your losses baby, and go
Just count you losses baby, and go

Well I gotta run, gotta be free
Don't hold me down
No baby
Yeah, I gotta run, I gotta be free
Don't hold me down
No baby

Yeah, I gotta run, I gotta be free
Don't hold me down
No baby

March 31, 2008

Song of the Week: Sundays

Over the weekend, I downloaded from iTunes the new album from Counting Crows, called Saturday Nights and Sunday Mornings.  It's been six years and well worth the wait for this wonderful new mix of songs.  One of my favorites is a song called Sundays:

Coloured rubbers and a bedroom set
I wouldn't know it if it hit me
You take a little step and then it feels like love
I think I better get a little of it in me
Give me a kiss
I think it feels like love
Give me a kiss
I think it feels like sunshine
C'mon baby, light me up
I wanna look into your eyes until I go blind and...

You think that you can do without me
I can't do anything at all
You think that you can do without me
But I don't believe in Sundays
And I don't believe in anything at all

Your mother make you in a parking lot
My mother made me out of flesh and wire
Try to remember what you might forget
I try to remember everything
Try to remember so you don't disappear
Try to remember so you don't fade away
Your mother made you out of smoke and rain
Your mother made you in a fire that's faded

You think that you can do without me
I can't do anything at all
You think that you can do without me
But I don't believe in Sundays
And I don't believe in anything at all

I wanna touch you for the things I'm losing
I wanna touch you for my self-respect
Give me a reason or I might stop breathing
Give me a reason why I'm soaking wet
Gotta stop breathing cuz the sky is falling
I might go out and watch the moon explode
Give me directions to the highway crossing
I'll go lie down in the middle of the road

You think that you can do without me
I can't do anything at all
You think that you can do without me
But I don't believe in Sundays
And I don't believe in anything at all

I don't believe in Sundays
And I don't believe in anything at all
I don't believe in anything at all

February 25, 2008

LDS Church Reiterates "No Criticism" Policy

The LDS church, in response to the article published in the Salt Lake Tribune about Peter and Mary Danzig, issued a press release yesterday reiterating the church's strict zero tolerance policy for members who criticize church leaders.  The full text of the press release appears after the jump.  The gist is that the church did no wrong and that Danzig was wrong to send the letter and express his views on the subject.  The doublespeak evident in the press release is interesting: members can question and dig and come to their own conclusions, but cannot express those views publicly if they differ from what church leaders think.  At the same time, the church says members were free to write their senators and express their views on the marriage amendment, but that the church didn't tell them what those views had to be.

The press release also erroneously ascribes an error to the Tribune's reporting by wrongly stating that the article said Danzig suffered official church discipline.  The article does not say that, but does use the generic term "discipline."  Danzig lost his place in the orchestra, was summoned numerous times for interrogations by church leaders, and was told he would be excommunicated.  For the church to say he wasn't "disciplined" is disingenuous. 

It appears that people can leave the church, but the church can't leave people alone.

Continue reading "LDS Church Reiterates "No Criticism" Policy" »

February 23, 2008

Welcome Salt Lake Tribune Readers

The Salt Lake Tribune published this morning in its online edition an article about Peter and Mary Danzig, the LDS couple harassed out of the church because of Peter's letter to the editor supporting BYU Professor Jeff Nielsen's opinion piece criticizing the LDS church's political stance on gay marriage. I blogged about this here and here.

The Tribune was kind enough to link here to Equality Time and to the full story written by Peter himself. So, to all Salt Lake Tribune readers, welcome! I hope you enjoy my blog. Feel free to comment.

February 17, 2008

Good Guys: My Former Bishop and Stake President

Yesterday I met with two friends of mine from the LDS church.  One is the newly installed Stake President in Plano.  The other is Bishop over the area in which I reside, with whom I served as Executive Secretary.  We met at the church for about an hour to discuss the logistics of handling my recent resignation as well as to talk about what my thoughts and feelings are regarding church contact with my wife and children who remain on the membership rolls of the LDS church. 

Both men I consider friends and both expressed warm feelings of love and friendship toward me, despite feeling a certain sadness about my decision (I told them I understood why, from their perspective, they might be sad, but I also explained why I think such feelings are misplaced).  I extended words of appreciation to them for how they have treated my family, and for their continuing friendship.  It was a productive meeting and while I don't care to go into all the details of what we discussed, I do want to say that I think these men exemplify what is good about Mormonism.  I think they are setting a good example for how heretics or apostates can and should be treated: with dignity, respect, and true love.  We left with positive feelings toward each other.  They allowed me to express some of my thoughts and frustrations with church culture; I allowed them to express their testimonies without criticism.  We disagreed agreeably.  I am sometimes accused of only looking for or talking about the negative things I see in the LDS church.  So I thought I would take this opportunity to tip my hat to these two fine men.  I hope that members of the ward and stake over which they preside will follow their example.

February 15, 2008

Fallout from Resignation Announcement

After sending my resignation letter via email to the LDS Bishop over the area in which I reside last night, I sent the following email to members of the ward's Elders Quorum:

Hey, guys. It's been awhile since I got a message from the quorum. Hope there aren't too many out-of-date addresses here. Anyway, I just thought I would alert you to the fact that as of today I am no longer a member of the LDS church, having voluntarily withdrawn my membership. I hope we can all continue to be friends despite our divergence in religious beliefs. If any of you are interested in learning more about my decision, feel free to visit my web log at www.equalitysblog.typepad.com, where today I posted an open letter to my Mormon friends and family. If any of you would like to follow up with me, feel free to contact me at my blog or by email at equalitytime@gmail.com.  Thanks.

Peace,

Eric

This was greeted generally with silence from the quorum members.  I received only one email from a fellow ward member and friend of mine expressing sadness at my decision but offering me best wishes and the prospect of continuing friendship, for which I am grateful.  He is a true friend and a true disciple of Christ. 

This morning, however, I was greeted with the following message from a member of the quorum whom I have never met:

Eric,

As you have voluntarily taken steps to disassociate yourself from the quorum, I personally (i.e. speaking for myself, having no authority to speak for the quorum) request that you refrain from sending e-mails to the quorum as a body in the future.  As you have made it clear that you do not desire to be contacted by members of the Church to dissuade you from your decision to have your name removed from the Church's records, I similarly do not desire to receive communications from you concerning my decision to enjoy the blessings of the restored gospel.  Should you receive an e-mail concerning quorum affairs in the future, I personally ask that you simply delete such e-mail from your system.

Thanks,

Ben

I responded to Ben, and to the quorum, with the following:

Wow, was I just on the receiving end of a foot-dusting?
 
But seriously, Ben, you wrote, "I similarly do not desire to receive communications from you concerning my decision to enjoy the blessings of the restored gospel."  My email to you and the quorum had nothing to do with my thoughts on your desire to enjoy the blessings you find in your association with the church, nor do I see a need to refrain from emailing you as a group of people I consider my friends. I sincerely wish you all the peace and joy you can find in your spiritual journey within the church and do not seek to dissuade you from the course you are on.
 
I sent the email to the quorum yesterday because I felt you'd each want to know from me, not the rumor mill, that I had done this, and I felt it best to be open about my reasons for doing so to avoid any misunderstandings or misconceptions about me or my reasons for leaving.  I respect each of you and have enjoyed your friendship.  I find curious your request that I refrain from emailing the quorum as a group, since I pose no threat to you nor do I approach you in anything but friendship and goodwill.  Perhaps if you find my correspondence distasteful, you could follow your own advice and "simply delete such e-mail from your system."
 
Peace,
 
Eric

I thought that might be the end of it.  Ben responded (just to me this time) with the following:

Eric, I can appreciate your desire to preempt any rumors you fear might be circulating around the Fifth Ward rumor mill (although you surely must know that your e-mail is likely to start more rumors than there otherwise would be); however, please don't pretend to be innocent of any intentions to pollute the minds of quorum members with the same over-intellectualized doubts that have apparently led to your problems.  After all, you are the one that provided the link to your blog, which honestly is the only source of anything that I know about you.

E-mails intended for quorum members that happen to wind up in your inbox are no longer intended for you, as you have decided to remove yourself from quorum membership.  Thus responding to the entire group when you receive such an e-mail is the action that I hope you will refrain from.  Obviously, you have every right to initiate e-mails to the group as a whole, but don't act surprised or play the victim when you send an e-mail to a group organized within the Church you are denouncing and then get responses that such actions are not appreciated.

My response to Ben is as follows:

Ben,

I am frankly surprised that you consider the minds of the quorum members weak and susceptible to doubt, and furthermore, I'm surprised that you feel that their faith in the church could be shaken by the letter I posted on my blog.
 
If you feel that I've got ulterior motives besides reaching out in friendship to friends I don't wish to lose, then you have allowed the very misconceptions that I wrote about to cloud your judgment here, which is disappointing but not surprising.

Furthermore, I find it interesting that you consider the dissemination of truth to be "polluting."  Certainly, if there were anything inaccurate or false on my blog, those who are endowed with knowledge of truth would have no trouble pointing out any erroneous assertions or flaws in reasoning, rather than simply engaging in dismissive name-calling.   As far as "over-intellectualization" goes, I do hope you are not so reticent to employ the intellectual acumen with which you have been blessed in favor of the clients employing your legal services as you appear to be with respect to your church's truth claims. 

On your notion that my sending the email to the quorum would have the effect of fueling rather than quelling rumors, I beg to differ.  You see, no one need question "what's going on with Brother Soderlund?"  They can simply read my letter and visit my blog and get it straight from the source which, it seems to me, is the exact opposite of what happens when people talk about someone without ever actually talking to that someone.  I realize it is a concept foreign to the experience of many in the church (addressing things head on, that is), but I felt it would be best in this situation.  This way, if anyone hears a rumor about me, there will be plenty of people who can say "no, that's not how it went down at all--here's a web site, read about it yourself."

Concerning your charge that I am "playing the victim," nothing could be further from the mark.  I am fully empowered.  I need not check my thoughts at the door, nor need I refrain from expressing myself out of fear of the consequences that might ensue from such expression.  And that's a great feeling.  I am willing to wager there are others in our ward who just wish they could say what they really think sometimes.  Trust me, it would take a helluva lot more than a couple poorly reasoned emails from someone I have never even met to make me feel victimized.

Peace,

Eric.

February 14, 2008

Open Letter to Mormon Friends and Family

To my friends from the Plano, Texas 5th Ward and to my other LDS friends and family who have been directed to this blog, I wish you a hearty welcome.

I understand that my disappearance from Sunday meetings and voluntary relinquishment of my callings—first as Executive Secretary, then as Elders’ Quorum secretary, and finally as home teacher—have been the subject of some curiosity and discussion among you. I have been disaffected with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for a little over two years now. The reasons for my disillusionment and disappointment with the church that I have called my spiritual home for nearly two decades are the subject of many of my posts here. If you are interested in knowing why I have chosen to cease active participation in the ward, I refer you to the left sidebar under the caption “Best of Equality.”

The purpose of this post, however, is simply to dispel a few myths or misconceptions and, perhaps, to quell a rumor or two and clear up any misunderstandings that may have arisen. I want you, my friends and family, to know that whatever my thoughts about and feelings toward the LDS church and some of its leaders, my feelings toward you are not diminished or tarnished in any way by my transformation of faith. If I loved you before, I love you now. If we were previously friends, I consider you a friend as much now as ever.  In the words of Joseph Smith, “I have enmity toward no man.” I have friends of many faiths and political persuasions, and see no reason to withhold fellowship from any simply because we do not share a particular world-view, ideology, or belief system.

My decision to resign my callings, substantially reduce my attendance at church functions and, more recently, to voluntarily withdraw my membership in the LDS church, (Download resignation_letter_redacted.pdf ) should in no way be viewed as indicative of my feelings toward the members of the LDS church with whom I have always enjoyed a pleasant association. To the contrary, that it has taken more than two years of researching, discussing, deliberating, and soul-searching before finally resigning my membership underscores the gravity of the decision—a choice made all the more difficult because of the love and respect I have for my Mormon family and friends. If the Mormons with whom I have associated in my ward and family were not basically honest, sincere, caring, compassionate folks, then leaving the LDS church would be much less emotionally arduous. In short, my disaffection with the LDS church has neither caused nor resulted from any disaffection with my Mormon friends and family.

One of my stated purposes in maintaining this blog is to dispel some of the myths often promulgated in the LDS church regarding those who “leave the fold.” It is not uncommon for members of the LDS church to speculate on the root cause of “apostasy.” Invariably, the consensus among the faithful is that those who leave do so because they either (a) have been offended or (b) want to sin. A variation on this is that the Mormon lifestyle was just too hard and the departing member was just too weak to “endure to the end.” A third explanation for apostasy often posited is that the “wayward” member is afflicted with a “hard heart” or “pride.” All of these (offense, desire to sin, pride) are the result, it is often surmised, of Satanic influence. The member neglected his duty to pray or read the scriptures, or pay tithing or go to the temple and was thus left open to be tempted of the devil or one of Satan’s millions of demonic henchmen who are constantly on alert for faltering saints, ever hoping to find a chink in the member’s spiritual armor.

Contrary to these clichéd explanations for why people leave the LDS church, in my experience meeting, discussing, corresponding, and counseling with hundreds of disaffected Mormons over the last two years, I have not encountered any who left the LDS church because they were “offended” personally by a fellow member.  So, all the cookies and paper hearts in the world (as well-intentioned as they may be) will not bring such people “back to the fold.” Nor have I encountered people who have left the church—believing it to be true—but just wanting to sin. Asking former members “which commandment they didn’t want to keep” might make for a good EFY anecdote, but it bears no resemblance to reality. People who leave the LDS church often (but not always) do make certain lifestyle changes (especially with respect to Sabbath observance, word of wisdom, and tithing). But in the great majority of cases, formerly faithful members who leave do so because they undergo a spiritual change on the inside. The outward manifestation follows the inner transformation.

I did not leave because someone offended me. Nor was there any particular “sin” that I just had to commit or any specific commandment I was incapable or unwilling to keep. This cucumber is perfectly capable of one day becoming a pickle, thank you very much. As for pride, I think that it actually takes a substantial measure of humility to examine one’s belief system critically, to accept the idea that the things you believed in so ardently for years—things you felt with “every fiber” of your being—might not be true. In my view, it is prideful to cling to beliefs for which there is no reasonable basis and to refuse to consider new information, new evidence, new arguments, new points of view. My willingness to re-examine and re-consider my faith, and to change as a result, is the opposite of proud. I think that the nearly two years’ worth of blog posts here put the lie to the notion that I left because I was offended or wanted to sin or that I have been overcome by demonic forces. Far from the picture of apostasy painted in LDS church culture, I am not miserable; I am not tormented; I am not walking in darkness or wallowing in pig slop. I still love my family; I am still gainfully employed; I still smile and wave at the neighbors and the school crossing guard; I still have spiritual experiences; I still have a conscience—indeed, it is my conscience that impelled me to withdraw my association with the church. So, worry not for me or my soul. Do not wonder what you may have said or done to drive me away—you had nothing to do with it. I have nothing but the best of feelings for you, my Mormon friends and family. I wish you Godspeed in your spiritual journey. And it is my sincere wish that we who were friends at first may yet be friends at last. Sincerely,

Eric Soderlund (aka Equality).

Images of the Restoration in the News

Not long ago, I featured the blog Images of the Restoration as a "Site of the Week."  Well, it appears this wonderful blog with accurate depictions of events from Mormon history is getting some attention in the mainstream religion press.  Yesterday, a story appeared at Beliefnet.com about the controversy this little blog has stirred up in Mormon circles.  In an article titled Artists Present an Uncensored View of Mormon History, religion writer Menachem Wecker describes the harshly negative reaction of church representatives and leaders to an accurate depiction of Mormon history.   Church public relations employee Kim Farah had "zero interest" in commenting on an "anti-Mormon" blog.  An LDS Bishop said the artists were "anti-Mormon activists parading as historians" and compared viewing their works of art with asking Hitler his opinion about the Jews. 

I find these comments from official representatives and leaders of the LDS church fascinating.  What they are saying is that depicting events from Mormon history (taken from official primary church documents) accurately is an "anti-Mormon" enterprise. In short, they are admitting that truth is antithetical to Mormonism.  It's a stunning admission, really.  Also interesting from the article is the fact that neither the church representatives nor any of the Mormon apologists were able to point out any inaccuracies in the portrayals found on the site.  Some criticize the quality of the depictions, but none could contest that the events depicted did not happen.  So, what's the problem? If, as some of my Mormon friends assert, the LDS church is not opposed to accurate depictions of its history, why the harsh criticisms and vitriol thrown at this site?  It's a curious thing, really.

February 01, 2008

Song of the Week: Dream Away

Dream Away by Babyface:
 

When this world
The real life world you're living in
Just gets too much for you to take
When you find
Too many troubles on your mind
And feel just like there's no escape

And it seems your heart's forgotten how to believe
Turn a page in your soul
There's a place you can go
Close your eyes and let your heart fly free

Dream away, dream away
Let imagination light your way
Take you as far as your heart can see
Dream away, dream away
To a place where hope is shining
Find your silver lining
Everything you need is just a dream away

Remember when
A dream could take you anywhere
Just a wish anything could be
When the farthest star was one more star you could reach
Take a look in your heart
'Cause that's where dreams are where it starts
Anything is real if you just believe

All it takes is faith to make your dreams come true
And somewhere in this world there'll be somebody
To share your dreams with you

January 24, 2008

Lawsuits Filed Against LDS Church and Members

Jennifer Centers, the daughter of prominent Latter-day Saint television executive Bruce Christensen, has filed two lawsuits in Colorado. One is a state-court action against  her former husband and several church members from her local congregation, and the other is a federal-court action against the LDS church, Christensen, and LDS apostle M. Russell Ballard, among others.

The state complaint alleges that, following her estrangement from her husband, members of her ward conducted a four-month orchestrated campaign of harassment, terror, extortion, and interference in the child custody proceedings that accompanied Centers' divorce.  Centers alleges that when she left the church and her husband in June 2006, LDS church member Kathryn Balley "was appalled" and began sending emails that included "threats of jail and commitment to a mental institution." Centers alleges that Balley conspired with other  LDS church members to  blackmail Centers and her long-time friend Chris Runyan into  "'repenting of their sins,' paying money, giving up custody of their children, and so forth." 

There are many gaps in the factual narrative that I would be interested in seeing filled in.  Centers and Runyan are proceeding pro se, which means they were apparently unable to get an attorney to take their case on a contingent fee basis.  This raises a big red flag for me on their ability to back up their allegations and prove them in a court of law.  While the complaint is not as polished as what one would expect from an accomplished attorney, it is pretty good for a pro se pleading.  I would like a little more background on the relationship of the parties.  Reading between the lines, it appears that Jennifer Centers and Chris Runyan became involved at some point, and that served as at least partial motivation for the actions of their ex-spouses.  But the narrative is sketchy on the nature of Chris and Jennifer's relationship.  There is also a bizarre sub-plot in the narrative concerning some sort of right-wing militia-type with whom they were previously associated.  It's not clear why he got involved or exactly what the history is between him and Jennifer and Chris.  I reserve judgment on the credibility of their allegations.  But I find them interesting nonetheless.  One of their state-law causes of action is for "Ethnic Intimidation" and is based on a Colorado statute that provides "it is the right of every person, regardless of race, color, ancestry, religion, or national origin, to be secure and protected from fear, intimidation, harassment, and physical harm caused by the activities of individuals and groups." See C.R.S. 18-9-121.  I've never read any cases on the tort of "ethnic intimidation" so it would be interesting to see this go all the way to verdict.  You can download the state complaint by clicking on the following link:
Download centers_state_complaint.pdf

The federal complaint is also interesting, but the narrative contains even less factual information and is a somewhat confusing read.  Centers alleges that in 1991 as a student at Brigham Young University, she began to remember "events of abuse from her childhood."  She received therapy from church clergy in her student ward.  It isn't clear, but is implied, that her alleged abuser was her father Bruce Christensen, who has apparently been the President of KSL, the broadcast TV network owned by the LDS church.  Christensen previously was the President of PBS and Dean of BYU's College of Fine Arts and Communications, as well as a reporter for KSL.  According to the complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado on December 28, 2007, Jennifer Centers told her uncle, who worked for the Boy Scouts of America, about the alleged abuse.  Her uncle notified the Boy Scouts in Arlington, Virginia, where Bruce Christensen was apparently serving in a Scout leadership position in his local ward, and the Boy Scouts contacted the local ward and demanded that Christensen be reassigned out of the Scouting program. 

According to the complaint, in contrast to the swift action taken by the Boy Scouts of America, after Jennifer told her dad about her "memories of abuse," Christensen "contacted high officials in the Mormon Church including Apostle Dallin Oaks and Apostle Ballard who took action helping Bruce Christensen 'fix the problem.'"  Jennifer alleges that Elder Ballard and other church leaders failed to follow church policies and procedures and failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding the reporting of abuse, and that they improperly shared privileged communications and interfered with her child custody action.  Centers alleges that church officials, including Elder Ballard, provided "information, encouragement, and support" to the people she alleges were blackmailing, harassing, and intimidating her and Chris Runyan.  Centers also alleges that despite their repeated demands to be left alone, church officials continue to "harass" her and Chris Runyan. 

Though the federal complaint was also filed pro se  (I can't figure out why, if they have a strong case, they couldn't find a plaintiffs' attorney to take their case on contingency--there are a number of lawyers who are making a living suing churches on similar charges) and accordingly has a somewhat amateurish tone (e.g., "The defendants conspired on at least two different occasions!"), cutting through the salacious details I see a couple of perhaps legitimate causes of action.  First is the allegation regarding the dissemination of privileged communications.  The privilege in a clergy-penitent relationship runs to the parishioner, not the clergy.  That is, it exists for the protection of the parishioner and is to be held inviolate with few exceptions.  It does not exist for the protection of the clergy or the institution he serves.  This is a principle that more than one LDS Bishop has at times forgotten.   So that allegation interests me.  Second is the allegation that the church failed to follow its own policies and procedures and violated state abuse-reporting laws.

Finally, again, I am intrigued by the "ethnic intimidation" charge.  Centers alleges that a church leader, seeing them in attendance at a meeting, gave a spontaneous sermon, looked them in the eye and said that sinners and apostates "would be trampled under the feet of the righteous."  Can church leaders be found liable for ethnic intimidation for preaching their religious views from the pulpit?  This has First Amendment implications, which I always find interesting.

The federal complaint can be downloaded by clicking on the following:
Download centers_federal_complaint_redacted.pdf
The federal case has been referred to a magistrate for a scheduling conference in March. 

I don't know whether the allegations in these complaints are true or not. Obviously, the defendants, including Elder Ballard and the Church, have a right to respond to the allegations and have their side of the case heard in court.  I don't know personally any of the individuals involved and am withholding judgment until a lot more information comes out.  I'll keep the readers of Equality Time posted as the case unfolds. 

Centers and Runyan have their own blog, from which I pulled the individual pages of the state-law complaint and posted here as a single file.  If you want to ask questions directly of the plaintiffs, please leave a comment on their blog.  Because of the sensitive nature of this post, I have closed comments.  I don't want anyone who comments here to get themselves (or this blog) into legal hot water with an off-hand comment.  Thanks.

January 20, 2008

Honoring Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.